U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,627
Garcia v. United States Homeland Security
as 3:2025cv00251
Petitioner:
Kevin Roberto Cantu Garcia
Respondent:
United States Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hall v. Nelson
as 3:2025cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jon Douglas Hall
Defendant:
Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olive v. Adams
as 1:2025cv00011
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Neal Olive
Respondent:
f/n/u Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watison v. Vantel
as 3:2025cv00189
Petitioner:
Raymond Watison
Respondent:
Warden Vincent Vantel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robards et al v. DCS Cookeville
as 2:2025cv00011
Petitioner:
Jessie Daniel Robards and Tamara Lashae Robards
Respondent:
DCS Cookeville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carter v. Halloway
as 3:2025cv00125
Petitioner:
Eric O. Carter
Respondent:
Warden James Halloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tate v. Perry
as 1:2025cv00008
Petitioner:
Johnny Tate
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hood v. Claflin
as 2:2025cv00005
Petitioner:
Kelly Scott Hood
Respondent:
Tim Claflin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Runions v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2025cv00006
Petitioner:
Donald Hollon Runions
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Defendant:
Vince Vantell, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chambers v. Adams
as 3:2025cv00057
Respondent:
Warden Robert Adams
Petitioner:
LaNorris O'Brien Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
