US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 7,260
Keymon et al v. Kearcey et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Kyle Wayne Keymon and James Allen Franks
Defendant:
Nathan Kearcey, Emma Gray, Amanda Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Tearson
as 2:2024cv02125
Petitioner:
Jason McKinney
Respondent:
Bruce Tearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mitchell v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Raymon A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Brandon Watwood, Robert J. Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Wardlow
as 1:2024cv01043
Petitioner:
Kelly Lee Pitts
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tolley v. Morrow et al
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Eric Jason Tolley
Defendant:
Morrow, Monroe Dodson, DeHoog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meehan v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02110
Petitioner:
Shaun Meehan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rankin v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
Jerrahmiah Rankin and Jerrahmiah J. Rankins
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Chief Fields and Chief Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Fields
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
K. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02107
Petitioner:
Willie Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
