US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 69,982
Adams v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 1:2024cv00295
Petitioner:
Curtis Wayne Adams
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Franklin v. Tidwell
as 5:2024cv00103
Defendant:
Judge John Tidwell
Plaintiff:
Marquis Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurdy v. BC Materials, LLC dba Big Creek Construction
as 6:2024cv00262
Defendant:
BC Materials, LLC dba Big Creek Construction
Plaintiff:
Ronald McCurdy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00665
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00666
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00667
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
RFCyber Corp. v. Volkswagen AG et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen AG
Plaintiff:
RFCyber Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
RFCyber Corp. v. Volkswagen AG et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Defendant:
Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
RFCyber Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
OPTRONIC SCIENCES LLC v. BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
OPTRONIC SCIENCES LLC
Defendant:
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Voltstar Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc,
as 4:2024cv00668
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc,
Plaintiff:
Voltstar Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
