US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 91 - 100 of 69,118
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Anderson County Jail
as 6:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Reginald Brown
Defendant:
Anderson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Robledo
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sykes v. Watt et al
as 4:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
James Elwyn Sykes
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Watt, FNU Starky, T. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. LifeScan, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Cellspin Soft, Inc.
Defendant:
LifeScan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ADASA Inc. v. SML Group Limited et al
as 4:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
ADASA Inc.
Defendant:
SML Group Limited, SML Intelligent Inventory Solutions LLC and SML (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Authentixx LLC v. Bank of America Corporation
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Authentixx LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Iron Bird LLC v. Yuneec International Co. Ltd
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Iron Bird LLC
Defendant:
Yuneec International Co. Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Steven Brice Wibracht et al v Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Jackson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
