US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 111 - 120 of 69,118
Cassel v. Todd et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Ashley L. Cassel
Defendant:
Tristen Todd, Karen Bishop, Rebecca Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilson v. Ibarra, et al.
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cox Wilson
Defendant:
Carolina Ibarra and Maria Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Courthouse News Service v. Gould, et al.
as 4:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Michael Gould, Megan LaVoie and David Trantham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mirsham v. Fiesta Mart, LLC
as 4:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Maryam Mirsham
Defendant:
Fiesta Mart, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TurboCode LLC v. uCloudlink (America) Ltd d/b/a GlocalMe
as 4:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
TurboCode LLC
Defendant:
uCloudlink(America) Ltd doing business as GlocalMe
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bello v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Defendant:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hinson v. J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths, Dr. FNU Wozniack, Kim King, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TurboCode LLC v. BEC Technologies Inc.
as 4:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
TurboCode LLC
Defendant:
BEC Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Shelley v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Shelley
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
