US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 69,102
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Toribiong v. Whipps, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Christa N. Toribiong
Defendant:
Surangel Whipps, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Telsync Technologies LLC v. ZTE Corporation
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Krishnan, et al.
as 4:2023cv00885
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Tucker Albin & Associates, Inc. v. Blue Star Roofing, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Tucker Albin & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Blue Star Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kravets v. City of McKinney et al
as 4:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Igor Kravets
Defendant:
City of McKinney and Detective Carl Severin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Infogation Corporation v. DENSO TEN Limited
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Infogation Corporation
Defendant:
DENSO TEN Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CDN Innovations, LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer International et al
as 4:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
CDN Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
ASUSTeK Computer International and ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Infogation Corporation v. Aisin Corporation
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Infogation Corporation
Defendant:
Aisin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
