US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 7,593
Duarte v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00978
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Mr. FNU Plunk, Warden I, II, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fishinghawk v. Mooneyham
as 6:2023cv00561
Petitioner:
Evan C Fishinghawk
Respondent:
FNU Mooneyham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hart v. Boyd
as 1:2023cv00915
Petitioner:
Aubrey Floyd Hart
Respondent:
Calvin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00954
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, State of Texas, Bexar County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Lowell Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00898
Petitioner:
Mickale Brooks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Antoine Sharod Benson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luevano v. State of Texas, et al.
as 5:2023cv00903
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
State of Texas, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00897
Petitioner:
Ellery Carter
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
David J. Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
