US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 7,580
Moses v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00647
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Donte Moses
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boatright v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Ronald Boatright
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boatright v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01091
Petitioner:
Ronald Keith Boatright
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Marquez v. Neely
as 5:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Karina Hernandez-Marquez
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keene v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv01110
Petitioner:
Karl Keene
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cabral v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00327
Petitioner:
Joe Antony Cabral
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Centeno v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv01072
Petitioner:
John Gilbert Centeno, Jr.
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01079
Petitioner:
Lowell Quincy Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lara v. Director, TDCJ
as 5:2023cv01058
Petitioner:
Joe Anthony Lara, Sr.
Respondent:
-TDCJ Director and Bobby Lumkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Effinger v. Cutler
as 1:2023cv01001
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Effinger
Respondent:
Gary Cutler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
