US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 251 - 260 of 7,593
Johnson v. 10th Appeals Ct, et al
as 6:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
R. Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
10th Appeals Ct and Judge Robert Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murnane v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Murnane
Respondent:
Bobby Lumkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Demond Franklin
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Warden of FCI Bastrop
as 5:2023cv00571
Petitioner:
Clayton Hall
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Bastrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ragan v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00317
Petitioner:
Lonnie Gene Ragan
Respondent:
Kelly R. Metz and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00530
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Montez
Respondent:
Angela Chevalier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brassfield v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
Donald Brassfield
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Reynolds, et al.
as 5:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armendariz v. Lumpkin
as 7:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Abel Armendariz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lara v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
Sergio Lara
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
