US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 281 - 290 of 7,594
Hutchins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Brian Hutchins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Lowell Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagos v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00283
Petitioner:
Alula Fantaye Hagos
Respondent:
The State of Texas and Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hughes v. Javier Salazar
as 5:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Frank Hughes
Respondent:
The State of Texas and Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguilar v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00270
Petitioner:
David A. Aguilar
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mbata v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Chukwuemeka Mbata
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Hijar
as 3:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Reyes Gutierrez
Respondent:
S. Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Geiger v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
Michael E. Geiger
Respondent:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fletcher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00211
Petitioner:
Terrance Fletcher
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
