US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 261 - 270 of 7,594
Lara v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
Sergio Lara
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Armstrong
as 6:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonzo v. State of Texas
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ruben Alonzo
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belmont v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
Jose Carlos Belmont
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belmont v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Jose Carlos Belmont
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davila v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00476
Petitioner:
John Anthony Davila
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
Raul Reyes, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Couch v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Rickey Eugene Couch
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Litchfield v. Hijar
as 3:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Austin Tyler Litchfield
Respondent:
Sandra Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
