Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38,074
White v. Mills et al
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
John D. White
Defendant:
Dee Ann Mills and Danielle Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIA Network v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
LIA Network
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Randall H. Erben, Chris Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Marvin Johnson
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Salazar v. SHI International Corp
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Norma Salazar
Defendant:
SHI International Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PENA et al v. CARDONA et al
as 5:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
JULIO PENA and NANCY PENA
Defendant:
CHIEF ROXANNE CARDONA, OFFICER J ORTIZ, CHAD COVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martiez et al v. State Trooper Mitchell et al
as 4:2024cv01761
Plaintiff:
Nelson D Martiez and Phuong T Martinez
Defendant:
State Trooper Mitchell and State Trooper Lara
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
