District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 91 - 100 of 441,560
Terry et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Terry and Tryla Terry
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hayes v. Carmart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Hayes, Jr
Defendant:
Carmart, Inc. doing business as Carmart of Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stanfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanfield and Randy Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier and Unknown Loosier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC v. Fat Brands, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Fat Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jordan v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 5:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eric Jordan
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
SHIN v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION A/K/A VIAPATH TECHNOLOGIES
as 5:2024cv00473
Defendant:
Global Tel*link Corporation and ViaPath Technologies (ViaPath)
Plaintiff:
DON SHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
