US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 8,600
Hodges v. Henrico County
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael Prince Hodges
Defendant:
Henrico County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dacha v. Moody, et al
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Dacha
Defendant:
Shelby Moody, Emory Sydney, Paris Veillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles O. Shephard
Defendant:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Keeley v. Hines
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keeley
Defendant:
Sheriff David R. Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Keys v. Colorado Security Agency Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Cynthia P. Keys
Defendant:
Colorado Security Agency Inc. and UNFI Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
