US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 8,586
Rubio v. The City of Alexandria Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Yasmani Gurri Rubio
Defendant:
The City of Alexandria Virginia, Justin M. Wilson, ADP Cody Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Halvorsen, et al. v. Powhatan County Public Schools, et al.
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
John Halvorsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Payne v. Moser
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Payne
Defendant:
Joshua Moser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Collins v. Collins
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Collins
Defendant:
Kimberly H. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hodges v. Henrico County
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael Prince Hodges
Defendant:
Henrico County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dacha v. Moody et al
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Dacha
Defendant:
Shelby Moody, Emory Sydney, Paris Veillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles O. Shephard
Defendant:
Alexander Diamond and Patricia Diamond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
