US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 8,591
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Benoir et al v. Town of Parksley, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Theslet Benoir, Clemene Bastien and Eben-Ezer Haitian Food Truck LLC
Defendant:
Town of Parksley, Virginia and Henry Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
McMickle v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Gary McMickle
Defendant:
Michael Bishop, Danielle L. Gately, Robert J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Coleman v. The City of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Leandra Mae Tanner, The City of Norfolk, Virginia, Robert Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
