US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 8,625
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
McMickle v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Gary McMickle
Defendant:
Michael Bishop, Danielle L. Gately, Robert J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Coleman v. The City of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Leandra Mae Tanner, The City of Norfolk, Virginia, Robert Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hardy v. Chesapeake Hospital Authority
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hardy
Defendant:
Chesapeake Hospital Authority
Williams v. Bunim Murray Productions, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Carla Williams
Defendant:
Bunim Murray Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Robinson et al v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Andre Robinson and Elise Simone Williams
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
