US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,049
Guynup v. Richardson et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Traci Guynup
Defendant:
Jean Richardson, Mr. Todd Sauers, Officer Terry Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooker v. Facciani et al
as 7:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Martha Kay Baird Hooker
Defendant:
Cheryl Facciani, Timothy Greenway, Brent Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Treubert v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Kirk John Treubert
Defendant:
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ross v. Conner et al
as 3:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
LaQuandra Erica Ross
Defendant:
Amanda Conner and Dwayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bermeo v. Andis et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Dyanie Bermeo
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Scott Snapp, Jamie Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuqua v. Centra Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Tre'Mane Fuqua
Defendant:
Centra Health, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harless v. BAE Systems Controls, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Stephen Warner Harless
Defendant:
BAE Systems Controls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Dugger v. Buchanan County Department of Social Services et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Mathew R Dugger
Defendant:
Buchanan County Department of Social Services and Bridgett McGraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dugger v. Stiltner
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mathew R Dugger
Defendant:
Eddie Stiltner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dugger v. Mays
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Mathew R Dugger
Defendant:
Jennifer Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
