US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 171 - 180 of 25,007
Lamb v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lamb
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wilburn et al v. Chance
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Benny R. Wilburn and Christie R. Wilburn
Defendant:
Kyle Chance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. The United States of America
as 7:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Charlene Hall Hill
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2024cv81549
Petitioner:
Larry Ray Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
White v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Shawn White
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Javon Lamont Arrington
Defendant:
Sgt. Hall, Sgt. Boles and Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Warden Artrip, Investigator Harris, Assistant Warden Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Demetric Markie Venable
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn, Honorable D. Arthur Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. SWVRJA Abingdon Medical et al
as 7:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Rocky Woodard
Defendant:
SWVRJA Abingdon Medical and Dr. Gregory Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
