US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 211 - 220 of 25,061
Keyser v. Giddy Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jamie Keyser
Defendant:
Giddy Holdings, Inc. and Brett Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Hall v. Physicians to Women Inc.
as 7:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Janet Hall
Defendant:
Physicians to Women Inc. and Physicians to Women, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A.B.C.,a minor, by and through Courtney Windhom, her next friend v. France et al
as 7:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Allison Brooke Callahan and A. B. C.
Defendant:
Joseph Hoyle France and J.B. Hunt Transport Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cooper v. Staff of WRSP et al
as 7:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Staff of WRSP, Med Team, CO Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Warden of USP Lee County
as 7:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Sonny Adam Shields
Respondent:
Warden of USP Lee County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Overton v. Salem VAMC of Roanoke Virginia
as 7:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Herbert Norris Overton
Defendant:
Salem VAMC of Roanoke Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Wise
as 7:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Miller
Defendant:
J. Wise and T. Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foot Levelers, Inc. v. Maggs
as 7:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Foot Levelers, Inc.
Defendant:
Tim Maggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hodges v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Sandra S. Hodges
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hegedus et al v. US Bank National Association
as 5:2023cv00017
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
