US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 8,918
Cline v. Arceo et al
as 3:2024cv05309
Plaintiff: Lyric Leeyn Cline, Sr
Defendant: Montana Arceo and Brandon Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00547
Petitioner: Tayan Jackson
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00539
Petitioner: Tayan Jackson
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norton v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner: Daniel Norton
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Navarette v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00541
Petitioner: Jorge J Navarette
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner: Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowley v. Caternolo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner: Ryan Rowley
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00531
Petitioner: Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nguyen v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00525
Petitioner: Anh Vu Nguyen
Respondent: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nanez v. Sapp et al
as 3:2024cv05293
Plaintiff: Shawn Dale Nanez
Defendant: Penelope Sapp, Genie Elton, K. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?