Otis v. Clark et al
| Christopher Otis |
| Clark, Hill, Anderson, Eric Higgins, Jones, Knight, Atwood and Smith |
| 4:2022cv00437 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that #1 Complaint filed by Christopher Otis be dismissed, without prejudice. Objections due within 14 days of date of Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/30/2022. (csf) |
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff an IFP application (AO 240), along with a certificate of inmate account and calculation sheet; and directing Plaintiff to either: (1) pay the $402 filing fee, in full; or (2) complete and sign the IFP application, have an authorized prison official complete and sign the certificate of inmate account and calculation sheet, and return the completed IFP application, certificate, and calculation sheet to the Clerk within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 05/13/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Otis.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
