Woodward v. Gibson et al
Robert E Woodward |
Henry, James Gibson, Robinson, Christopher, Bivens, Emery, Hart, Shipman, Scott Taylor, Carroll and Madden |
5:2019cv00019 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Patricia S Harris |
James M Moody |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice by Bivens, Carroll, Christopher, Emery, James Gibson, Hart, Henry, Madden, Robinson, Shipman, Scott Taylor (Hudson, Renae) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Renae Ford Hudson on behalf of Bivens, Carroll, Christopher, Emery, James Gibson, Hart, Henry, Madden, Robinson, Shipman, Scott Taylor (Hudson, Renae) |
|
Summons Issued as to All Defendants and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (ljb) |
Filing 8 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Robert E Woodward. (ljb) |
Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris added back into a Referral Role pursuant to #7 Order. (jak) |
|
Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Robert E Woodward. (ljb) |
|
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Robert E Woodward.(kdr) |
|
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Robert E Woodward.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert E Woodward. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.