Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Poitras v. Clark
as 2:2026cv00234
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Poitras
Defendant:
Charity Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv08354
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Henry Holmes v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 26-2653
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Jones v. Holiday
as 2:2026cv02814
Petitioner:
Dewayne Jones
Respondent:
Warden Henry Holiday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russaw v. Drost et al
as 1:2026cv01901
Plaintiff:
JhaJuan Russaw
Defendant:
C.O. Drost, C.O. Labore, C.O. Bulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert, Carl v. State of Wisconsin, Department of Health Services et al
as 3:2026cv00617
Plaintiff:
Carl C. Gilbert, II
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Department of Health Services, Kirsten L. Johnson, William Duckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Hamilton & Miller, P.A. et al
as 1:2026cv24638
Plaintiff:
Catrell Henry
Defendant:
Hamilton & Miller, P.A. doing business as Hamilton, Miller & Birthisel, LLP and Jerry D. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Adams v. Meink
as 8:2026cv02674
Plaintiff:
Henry D. Adams
Defendant:
Honorable Dr. Troy E. Meink
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
