Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Delman v. Nawabi et al
as 1:2026cv03050
Plaintiff:
Richard Delman
Defendant:
Wahid Nawabi, Kevin P McDonnell, Mary Clum and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26363
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07787
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry v. Brown Jake & McDaniel, P.C.
as 3:2026cv00449
Plaintiff:
Jacob Henry
Defendant:
Brown Jake & McDaniel, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
GARVIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2026cv00242
Plaintiff:
LANCE HENRY GARVIN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ogle v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04487
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Ogle
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03074
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv01405
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sutrick, Dennis v. Giroux, Richard
as 3:2026cv00952
Petitioner:
Dennis Henry Sutrick
Respondent:
Warden Richard Giroux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
