Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36,265
Randall v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00322
Plaintiff: Randy Randall
Defendant: Eric S Higgins, Greg Henry and Will Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01694
Plaintiff: Henry Nicholson
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ELLSWORTH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv04763
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN ELLSWORTH and HENRY ELLSWORTH
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harding v. Kumwenda et al
as 4:2024cv01308
Plaintiff: Anthony Harding
Defendant: Henri Kumwenda and Jonathan David Goldsborough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
In re: Henry Berrocal
as 24-50271
Petitioner: In re: Henry B. Berrocal
Berrocal v. Salazar
as 24-50270
Petitioner: Henry B. Berrocal
Respondent: Sheriff Javiaer Salazar, Bexar County Sheriff's Department
Malcolm Neely v. Elmore County, et al
as 24-11112
Plaintiff: MALCOLM NEELY
Defendant: ELMORE COUNTY, ELMORE COUNTY COMMISSION, HENRY HINES, individually and in his Official Capacity as a member of the Elmore County Commission and others
Fullilove v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02875
Plaintiff: Henry Fullilove
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Dublin Bar and Grill, Inc. doing business as Dublin's Bar & Grill, Richard Pina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00891
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henry Mack v. Kurt Osmundson, et al
as 24-1556
Plaintiff: HENRY L. MACK
Defendant: KURT OSMUNDSON, CHERRYL HINTHORNE, Warden, AMALIA MANNING and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?