Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02123
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01807
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller et al v. Vloedman et al
as 5:2026cv00561
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller and Andrea Miller
Defendant:
Henry Vloedman and Great West Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00541
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00204
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jaquez v. Tulsa County et al
as 4:2025cv00584
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Tulsa County, D Holden, K Warne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaquez v. Larson et al
as 4:2025cv00522
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Dennis Larson, Shannon Jennings, Stephen A Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dovitski et al v. Bowling et al
as 4:2025cv00519
Plaintiff:
John Henry Dovitski, Heather Leanne Dovitski, JD and others
Defendant:
Bret Bowling and Timothy Case
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Hicks et al
as 5:2025cv01034
Plaintiff:
Robert C Jones, III
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Curtis Bussett, Chris Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
