Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuluva et al v. Taylor
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
William Kuluva, Kastle Ventures, LLC and Sterling Gaming International, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Taylor v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01472
Plaintiff:
Scott Taylor
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Michael Parkins v. Deigarion Staten, et al
as 24-1814
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M. Staten, Corporal, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Scott Taylor, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Watson, Lt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Tremayne Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Brandon Davis, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Owen Faricy Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Scott Taylor
Defendant:
Owen Faricy Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Scott Taylor, M Kelly, B Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thrift v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Alan Thrift
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, Tyrone Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh, et al. v. Jenal, et al.
as 24-809
Plaintiff:
VISHAL SINGH, JESSICA WOODWARD, SCOTT TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
JOHN JENAL, an individual, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity, JEFFREY LEWIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
