FEDD v. CALDWELL et al
| LEVI ARTHUR FEDD |
| Antoine Caldwell, WILAM, RODER, HUNIG, WHITTINGTON, Palmer, Coleman, HONGAN, COOKS, Bray, HOGAN and Homer Bryson |
| 6:2017cv00078 |
| June 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| R. Stan Baker |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER adopting the 21 Report and Recommendations, granting Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, and dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's complaint. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 05/22/2019. (thb)
|
|
Filing
21
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court GRANT Plaintiff's 20 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, DISMISS without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, and DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriat e judgment of dismissal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2019). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 4/30/2019. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
