Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Davis #237805 v. Hogan et al
as 2:2026cv00160
Plaintiff:
Gordon Allan Davis #237805
Defendant:
Unknown Hogan and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03265
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Inoa v. Obidiah et al
as 6:2026cv01566
Plaintiff:
Carlos Inoa
Defendant:
Kevin Obidiah and Hogan Truck Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hogan v. XTO Energy
as 26-50595
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hogan
Defendant:
XTO Energy Company, Randy Cleveland, XTO CEO/President and John Does 1-5
Marion v. Douglas et al
as 1:2026cv04011
Plaintiff:
Erica Marion
Defendant:
Zachary Louis Douglas, Hogan Truck Leasing, LLC and Saddle Creek Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Hogan v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08263
Plaintiff:
Latosha Hogan
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and Strength of Nature, LLC
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jordan v. D'Agrosa et al
as 4:2026cv01095
Defendant:
Unknown Johnson, Paul D'Agrosa, Joseph Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Deshon Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Hogan et al
as 3:2026cv01002
Plaintiff:
Tervarus Gary
Defendant:
Bryan Hogan, Ripple, Ripple Sonnenbeng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobronski v. Olivet Pharmacy LLC et al
as 2:2026cv12262
Defendant:
Olivet Pharmacy LLC, Olivet Pharmacy, Lon David Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
GARY v. HOGAN et al
as 1:2026cv01413
Plaintiff:
TERVARUS GARY
Defendant:
BRYAN HOGAN, RIPPLE, SONNENBENG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
