Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bowers v. Page et al
as 4:2026cv05081
Defendant:
George Edwin Page, Eddie, J. Brian Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Whittington v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00546
Plaintiff:
Brittany Whittington
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation as Successor in Interest to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Whittington v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2026cv02158
Plaintiff:
Christopher Whittington
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Whittington
as 5:2026cv04191
Plaintiff:
Robert Clinton Jones
Defendant:
Julian Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Whittington
as 5:2026cv04475
Petitioner:
Jake Antonio Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald v. Turner et al
as 5:2026cv03889
Plaintiff:
Tommy Donald
Defendant:
Bo Turner, S Nicholas and J Whittington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Whittington
as 26-2689
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILBERT WHITTINGTON
Chestnut v. Whittington
as 6:2026cv04168
Petitioner:
Ray Edward Chestnut
Respondent:
Anthony Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Whittington et al
as 5:2026cv03626
Plaintiff:
Raymond Young
Defendant:
J Whittington, Mike Miller and Sarah Giddens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
