Bierbrauer v. DOC et al
| Brandon Bierbrauer |
| Chrystal Anderson, Henry D, Dettloff, Stone Staci, Jones, Zahn, Dennis, Shane M, Padelford, Adam C, Livingston, Kodet, DOC, Zahn & Canine Partner and Bryan F |
| 0:2024cv03812 |
| October 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Dulce J Foster |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re IFP #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (jam) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Brandon Bierbrauer in SUPPORT OF #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Brandon Bierbrauer filed by Brandon Bierbrauer.(jam) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Brandon Bierbrauer. (jam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adam C, Bryan F, Chrystal Anderson, DOC, Dennis, Dettloff, Henry D, Jones, Kodet, Livingston, Padelford, Shane M, Stone Staci, Zahn, Zahn & Canine Partner filed by Brandon Bierbrauer. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd, 4th - Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. (Attachments: #1 Addendum, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope) (jam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
