Johnson v. Humphrey et al
| Tyrone R. Johnson |
| Michael Humphrey, Ronald Erdos, Larry Greene, Linnea Mahlman, Walter Sammons, D. McCroskey, Harold Bell, Eaches, Rodgers, Unit Manager Oppy, Weaks, William Cool, Major Warren, Anthony Cadogan and Cynthia Davis |
| 1:2018cv00043 |
| January 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
DECISION AND ENTRY adopting the Reports and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 34) and Terminating this case in this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/21/19. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
34
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 26 be GRANTED, all pending motions be DENIED as MOOT 24 28 33 and this matter be CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 2/11/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/28/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
25
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 22 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/21/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment individual capacity conditions-of-confinement claim asserted against Defendant Eaches and Eighth Amendment individual capacity excessive-force claim asserted against Defendants McCroskey, Bell, and Rodgers. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/29/18. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: The complaint (Doc. 1-1) be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of plaintiffs Eighth Amendment individu al capacity conditions-of-confinement claim asserted against defendant Eaches and Eighth Amendment individual capacity excessive-force claim asserted against defendants McCroskey, Bell, and Rodgers. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff serve a summons a nd copy of the complaint on defendants Eaches, McCroskey, Bell, and Rodgers. Because plaintiff paid the filing fee in this matter and is not proceeding in forma pauperis, he is responsible for serving the complaint on defendants Eaches, McCroskey, Be ll, and Rodgers in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. 2. Plaintiff shall serve upon defendants or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon defendants attorney, a copy of every further pleading or oth er document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate stating the date a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to s or defendants counsel. 3 . Because plaintiff has paid the required fee (Doc. 5 (noting receipt of payment)), his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is DENIED as moot. 4. Plaintiff shall inform the Court promptly of any changes in his address which may occur during the pendency of this lawsuit.( Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 03/05/2018. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
