Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Scott v. Town of Mosses, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2026cv00490
Plaintiff:
Marvenita Scott
Defendant:
Town of Mosses, Alabama, Harold Bell, Laura Crum Ptomey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00660
Plaintiff:
Harold Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Defendant:
Kelly Storm, Dr. Aradhana Gill, R. Hale and others
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tyrone Johnson v. Michael Humphrey, et al
as 19-3172
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY OSBOURNE, HAROLD BELL, UNKNOWN EACHES and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL HUMPHREY, UNIT MANAGER UNKNOWN OPPY, LARRY GREENE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE R. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Humphrey et al
as 1:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Humphrey, Ronald Erdos, Larry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Humphrey et al
as 2:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Humphrey, Ronald Erdos, Larry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovett v. Eaches et al
as 1:2017cv00757
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Lovett
Defendant:
Jeremy Eaches, Fri, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harshod Mehta, et al v. City of Upland, et al
as 17-55553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARSHOD MEHTA, an individual and KAUSHIKA MEHTA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF UPLAND, a public entity, LAVELLE BROWN and JAMES HAROLD BELL, an individual
Pullen v. Combs et al
as 1:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
Combs, Shaw, Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
