Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tyrone Johnson v. Michael Humphrey, et al
as 19-3172
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY OSBOURNE, HAROLD BELL, UNKNOWN EACHES and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL HUMPHREY, UNIT MANAGER UNKNOWN OPPY, LARRY GREENE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE R. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Humphrey et al
as 2:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Humphrey, Ronald Erdos, Larry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Humphrey et al
as 1:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Humphrey, Ronald Erdos, Larry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovett v. Eaches et al
as 1:2017cv00757
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Lovett
Defendant:
Jeremy Eaches, Fri, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harshod Mehta, et al v. City of Upland, et al
as 17-55553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARSHOD MEHTA, an individual and KAUSHIKA MEHTA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF UPLAND, a public entity, LAVELLE BROWN and JAMES HAROLD BELL, an individual
Pullen v. Combs et al
as 1:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
Combs, Shaw, Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harshod Mehta, et al v. City of Upland, et al
as 16-56421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARSHOD MEHTA, an individual and KAUSHIKA MEHTA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF UPLAND, a public entity, LAVELLE BROWN, ERIC WIDEN, an individual and others
Harshod Mehta et al v. City of Upland et al
as 5:2015cv01164
Defendant:
James Harold Bell, III, Lavelle Brown, City of Upland and others
Plaintiff:
Harshod Mehta and Kaushika Mehta
Harshod Mehta et al v. City of Upland et al
as 2:2015cv04495
Defendant:
James Harold Bell, III, Lavelle Brown, City of Upland and others
Plaintiff:
Harshod Mehta and Kaushika Mehta
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
