Johnson v. Chambers-Smith et al
| Kevin Johnson |
| Annette Chambers-Smith, N Harris, Mr Chilcote, Mr Salas, Jamez, Meyers, Mr Church, E Corey, Ronald Erdos, Linnea Mahlman, Mr Denney, Ms Reuter, Joshua McAllister, Mr Haywood, Harold Clarke, Kyle Rosch, Ronald E Carter, M Phillips and Mr Bean |
| 2:2021cv04635 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H Watson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee for cv action: $ 402.00, receipt number 200COL067645. (er) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. (RETURN TO SENDER - RELEASED 10/5/21) Mail sent to Kevin Johnson as to #2 Order. (Attachments: #1 Order - doc 2) (er) |
Filing 2
ORDER - re #1 Complaint filed by Kevin Johnson. If Plaintiff intends to proceed with this action, he is DIRECTED to cure this deficiency by submitting the remaining $2.00 of the requisite filing fee, or by submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis, to the Court by NOVEMBER 19, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 20, 2021. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kevin Johnson against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
