Perotti v. USA et al
| John W. Perotti and Patrick J. Roselli |
| United States Of America, David J. Ebbert, Walter Dobushek, Peg Trently, Charlie Daniels, Gary Allred, M. Andreis, Collins, Brad R. Cink, Serby, T.K. Cozza-Rhodes, Julie Wands, Tucker, Young, Klein, Martin, B. Hill, Bond, Quintana, Sutton, Chapman, Maditch and Gary Ulrich |
| 3:2012cv01860 |
| September 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Wayne |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) Accordingly, since the undisputed record shows that Perotti has been provided with ongoing treatment (including x-rays, MRI, wrist surgery, consultation with a pain management specialist, and mul tiple pain medications) and that his claims are solely premised upon his disagreement with a medical determination by Dobushak that non-narcotic pain medication was appropriate for his care, a viable deliberate indifference claim has not been stated under Estelle. Summary judgment will be granted in favor of Remaining Defendant Doctor Dobushak. An appropriate Order will enter.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 3/15/16. (cc)
|
|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Whether the purported loss of Inmate Perotti's personal property was negligent or otherwise wrongful, an FTCA claim concerning the loss of property is barred under § 2680(c). Defendant United States of America's motion for summary judgment will be granted. An appropriate Order will enter.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 3/2/16. (cc)
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Plaintiffs are also reminded that their Amended Complaint must be complete in all respects. It must be a new pleading which stands by itself without reference to the Original or Amended Complaints previously filed in this matter. The amended complaint should only include Plaintiff's surviving USP-Canaan related claims which should be set forth in short, concise and legible statements. It should specify which actions are alleged as to w hich USP-Canaan Defendants. Failure of the Plaintiffs to timely submit an amended complaint which complies with the standards set forth herein or otherwise respond to this Order will result in dismissal of their action for failure to prosecute. An appropriate Order will enter. (See Memorandum) re 67 MOTION to Dismiss or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by United States Of America, 66 MOTION to Dismiss or in the alternative, For Summary Judgment Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 3/9/15. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
