Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 51 - 60 of 43,559
Harris v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff: Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant: Marc T. Treadwell, Charles H. Weigle, Sonja Profit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00971
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lawson v. Maldonado
as 3:2024cv00972
Petitioner: Jeremy Michael Lawson
Respondent: Jeanette Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff: Jordan Hinton
Defendant: State of Connecticut, Daniel Dougherty, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betancurth v. USA
as 3:2024cv00976
Petitioner: Jose Del Los Santos Rubio Betancurth
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Federal Insurance Company v. Titeflex Corporation
as 3:2024cv00963
Plaintiff: Federal Insurance Company as subrogee of Donald and Kelly Price
Defendant: Titeflex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00962
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00965
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dixon v. Adanna et al
as 3:2024cv00960
Plaintiff: James Dixon
Defendant: Adanna and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Czeremcha et al
as 3:2024cv00938
Plaintiff: James Pena
Defendant: Czeremcha, Nick Rodriguez, Zack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?