Cases 71 - 80 of 49,659
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
120 Clay Development, LLC et al v. PNC Bank, National Association
as 3:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
120 Clay Development, LLC and 240 Clay Development, LLC
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ahern v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00840
Defendant:
Aaron Curtis Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Lofall v. County of Clackamas et al
as 3:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
Tyler Allen Lofall
Defendant:
County of Clackamas, Clackamas County Sheriff's Department, Clackamas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UC Market, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
UC Market, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Lofall v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Tyler Allen Lofall
Defendant:
State of Oregon, County of Clackamas, Clackamas County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. USA
as 3:2024cv00843
Petitioner:
Hector Javier Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nestler v. Sloy, Dahl & Holst, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Stephen Nestler
Defendant:
Sloy, Dahl & Holst, LLC and Alta Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Nestler v. Sloy, Dahl & Holst, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
Stephen Nestler
Defendant:
Sloy, Dahl & Holst, LLC and Alta Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
