Cases 41 - 50 of 85,480
Tiburcio v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv02617
Petitioner:
Juan Tiburcio
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WILKINS v. DEGNER
as 1:2024cv06999
Plaintiff:
KHALIL WILKINS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEGNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOQUETE-PEREZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07006
Petitioner:
EVANGELISTA MOQUETE-PEREZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AKINMADEYEMI v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07003
Petitioner:
AKINTOLA AKINMADEYEMI
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEWART v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06917
Petitioner:
ROSHAWN STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BERENATO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA
as 2:2024cv02609
Petitioner:
DAVID M. BERENATO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRAYBOY v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURTIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
KEYONTAE D. CURTIS
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. VANATA et al
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LANE
Defendant:
BRIANNA C. VANATA, DAVID RUSSO and MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
