Cases 61 - 70 of 95,013
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05491
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Defendant:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Engberg v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00888
Petitioner:
Shane R Engberg
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024at00787
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Becton
as 3:2024cv03725
Petitioner:
Marvin Harris
Respondent:
Diana Becton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024cv01763
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. CDCR Director et al
as 3:2024cv01080
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Q. Mitchell
Respondent:
CDCR Director, C. Pfieffer and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muehlhausen #139312 v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2024cv08124
Petitioner:
David A Muehlhausen
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05501
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Hernandez v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv00736
Petitioner:
Victor Alfonso Hernandez
Respondent:
Jason Schultz and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Massie v. Guzman
as 1:2024cv00726
Petitioner:
Luis Jesus Massie
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
