Cases 11 - 20 of 232,078
Pfister v. Blomquist
as 6:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Quincy Dean Pfister
Defendant:
Thomas Blomquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinsey-Pace v. Douglas County Sheriff Office
as 6:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Schlaman #1758 et al
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Sean Dion Ross
Defendant:
Schlaman #1758, Leach #1758, City of San Diego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Macomber et al
as 3:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Wilson
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, James Hill, M. Colnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mapson
as 3:2024cv03706
Plaintiff:
Charis Mapson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of California et al
as 4:2024cv03719
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office et al
as 5:2024cv03721
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office, S. Huss, A. Coudillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Andes
as 5:2024cv03722
Plaintiff:
Walter Johnson
Defendant:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. CDCR Director et al
as 3:2024cv01080
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Q. Mitchell
Respondent:
CDCR Director, C. Pfieffer and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024at00495
Petitioner:
Victor Alfonso Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Jason Schultz and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
