Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 24,000
BOLDEN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00505
Petitioner: JERMARISE DEJUANN BOLDEN
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GRAVES v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner: LANCE SAMUEL GRAVES
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HAIRSTON v. THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JIWAN HAIRSTON
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STARNES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff: RACQEL STARNES
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHESNEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff: KRISTIN ELIZABETH CHESNEY
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MOORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff: MOORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant: META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK PAYMENTS, INC., SICULUS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
CHAPPELLE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff: RONDA CHAPPELLE
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HOOVER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00497
Petitioner: DEQUAN AHMAD HOOVER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. et al v. FREITAS
as 1:2024cv00496
Petitioner: AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Respondent: CHRISTIANO FREITAS
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?