Cases 1 - 10 of 4,679
Lawson v. City of St Albans, WV et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Reginald Craig Lawson
Defendant:
City of St. Albans, WV, Kanawah County, WV and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jay James Fields
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carter v. Hively
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter
Defendant:
Herbert L. Hively, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thompson v. Wilshire
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Maurice-Edward: Thompson
Defendant:
S. Wilshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael v. Givens et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Robert Logan Michael
Defendant:
Pamela Givens, Sandra May, Shirley Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Mandrell Horton
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dixon v. Lovett
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
