Cases 1 - 10 of 756
Fitzpatrick v. McKnight
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Brandon Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Daniel McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
Mr. S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McKinney v. Hensel et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. McKinney
Defendant:
James Hensel, III, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. Morrsey et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
Patrick Morrsey, William K. Marshell, III, Shelby O. Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Compton
Defendant:
J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McClure v. Tygart County Regional Jail
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Christie Coy McClure, Jr.
Defendant:
Tygart County Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baisi v. Bleavins et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Cpl. John Bleavins, Lt. James Irwin, Western Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
