Cases 11 - 20 of 22,245
Stokes v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Lee E Stokes, Jr and Chango Kundalini
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Midget et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Waltilia Shre Robinson
Defendant:
Midget and Faust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Office, Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Tabor et al
as 2:2024cv02076
Plaintiff:
Shaun Jermaine Estes
Defendant:
Judge Stephen Tabor, Court CLerk Susie Hassett, Prosecutor Daniel Shue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Keith
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Evans
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cummings
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Gary Musselwhite, Robert Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. USA
as 4:2024cv00499
Petitioner:
Anthony Miles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC and Monica Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Forsman et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Waltilia Shre Robinson
Defendant:
Forsman, Stout and Beta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
