Cases 11 - 20 of 32,506
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Paxton v. Naphcare Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jonardo Paxton
Defendant:
Naphcare Medical Department and Haley F.N.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, ViaPath Technologies and Todd E Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Reaves
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections and David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. VA DOC et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
VA DOC, Kyle Rosch, Mack Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kennedy
Defendant:
Cpl Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Shirkey
as 7:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jonardo Paxton
Defendant:
Hyatt Browning Shirkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
