Cases 21 - 30 of 23,120
Moomey v. Tracey Jackson et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00579
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Nurse Terry, Tracy Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Moomey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Lt. Lovett et al
as 7:2024cv01221
Defendant:
Lt. Pelzer, Lt. Lovett and Lt. Griffen
Plaintiff:
Taylor Harlequin Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodgett v. Babers et al (INMATE4)
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Benny Lee Woodgett
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanspree v. Ephriam et al
as 1:2024cv00318
Defendant:
Nurse Webb and Sergeant Ephriam
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sanspree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greer v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00566
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Captain Rogers and David Lamar
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Ometris Williams
Defendant:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alverson v. Securus Technologies, LLC
as 2:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Alverson
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, LLC and Jaypay, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brasher v. Davis et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen Brasher
Defendant:
Nurse Rebecca, Ann Davis, Nurse Jamie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Marshall et al
as 4:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Burton
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Carol Boone, Judge Phil K Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ringold v. Burch et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Defendant:
Paul Burch and Sam Houston
Plaintiff:
Marcus S. Ringold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
