Cases 41 - 50 of 30,614
Graves v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02114
Petitioner:
Lance Samuel Graves
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Newsome v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02115
Petitioner:
Ari Newsome
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHISNANT v. KEARNES et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
ERIC WHISNANT
Defendant:
SGT. KEARNES, LT. CRAVEN and CPL. LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neil v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02113
Petitioner:
David O'Neil
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Butler v. North Carolina General Court of Justice et al
as 5:2024ct03151
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nimrod Butler
Defendant:
North Carolina General Court of Justice and Lisa Scales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gause v. Covington et al
as 3:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Walter T. Gause
Defendant:
Ronald Covington, FNU Nealey, FNU Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHISNANT v. SEABOLT et al
as 1:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
ERIC WHISNANT
Defendant:
SHERIFF SEABOLT, BARKER, CAPT. RICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Buffaloe, Jr. et al
as 5:2024ct03149
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
Eddie Buffaloe, Jr., Todd Ishee, Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02112
Petitioner:
Stephen Brooks
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
