Cases 11 - 20 of 59,092
Williams v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center, J. Cinblon and Sgt. E. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Louisville Metro Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Detention Center, Chief Jailer, Public Affairs and Human Resources Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Householder v. Jordan et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Matthew Householder
Defendant:
Scott Jordan, Cookie Crews and Sgt. Jimo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Miller v. USA et al
as 0:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Glenn Miller
Defendant:
USA, Officer Hunt and Officer Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Modzelewski v. Craymer
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sally Modzelewski
Defendant:
Gideon Craymer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kight v. Burkette
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Kight
Defendant:
Duwayne Burkette
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 Civil Action to Restrain Harassment of a Victim
Dinh v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Quoc Dinh
Defendant:
Julie Campbell, Christopher D. Hunt, Jason K. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Cardwell et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Treyshawn L. Jones
Defendant:
Andre Cardwell, Bradley Hansford, D. Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
