Cases 31 - 40 of 140,696
Thompson v. Wilshire
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Maurice-Edward: Thompson
Defendant:
S. Wilshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Hensel et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. McKinney
Defendant:
James Hensel, III, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harco National Insurance Company v. All Quality, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Harco National Insurance Company
Defendant:
All Quality, LLC, Davis Properties of WV, LLC, Davis Industries, LLC a West Virginia limited liability company doing business as Davis Industries of WV, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brandon et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Chester Brandon, III
Defendant:
Commissioner William K. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Brown v. USA
as 1:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Lawrence Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Barrientos v. Watts et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Jose Barrientos
Respondent:
Watts and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JP Industrial Services, Inc. v. City of Ronceverte
as 5:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
JP Industrial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Ronceverte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Horton v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Mandrell Horton
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dixon v. Lovett
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bailor v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Bailor
Defendant:
Revlon Inc. and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
