Cases 31 - 40 of 65,998
Crumley v. Mallory
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Vincent Crumley, Jr
Defendant:
Mallory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Semonds v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Billy Semonds
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Land O'Lakes Inc Member Cooperative Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Ruelas v. Harper
as 5:2024cv05127
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Chief of Police Cody Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2023cv00241
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Taylor v. Capital One Financial Corp et al
as 4:2023cv00581
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
MF Outdoor Solutions Inc v. Turtle Creek Property LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
MF Outdoor Solutions Inc doing business as Plus Tree & Landscape
Defendant:
Turtle Creek Property LLC, Beitel Corp and Drucker & Falk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Leubner v. DoorDash Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Misty Leubner
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc, Orlando Long, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robinson v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Calvin Robinson, Kevin Robinson and Bilal Ali Salam
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornsberry v. Perkins et al
as 4:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Thornsberry
Defendant:
Brian T Perkins, Roosevelt G Barden, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatter v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Hatter, Jr
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins and Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
