Cases 61 - 70 of 351,013
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Williams v. Stanton
as 2:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Rahshid Williams
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Gregory et al
as 4:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. Parks
Defendant:
Kenneth Gregory, Craig Molder, Trent Van Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schnur v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mia Schnur
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Marr v. Olson et al
as 8:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Kylee A. Marr
Defendant:
Edward F. Olson and Vander Kooi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lammers v. County of Phelps NE et al
as 8:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jess T. Lammers
Defendant:
County of Phelps NE, Phelps County Corrections and Admin Penny Gregg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lammers v. County of Phelps NE et al
as 8:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Lammers
Defendant:
County of Phelps NE, Phelps County Corrections and Penny Gregg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Charging Crow
as 5:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lynette Charging Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Replevin & Conversion
Ewing v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Ewing
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
